The Radar · Edition 01
A short scan of developments worth your attention, filtered through one question: does this change how we should think about the work? If it does not change a decision, it is not here.
Current edition
Signal 01
Assets can be generated, revised, and prototyped in a fraction of the time they used to take.
Speed never answered whether the intervention was appropriate, useful, or connected to performance.
Whether teams redefine the designer’s value around investigation, evidence, and systems thinking.
Signal 02
Stakeholders increasingly expect learning work to connect to operational or behavioral outcomes.
A finished course happily coexists with an unchanged performance problem.
Whether measurement gets designed at the start of the work instead of bolted on after launch.
Signal 03
More support can live inside the workflow instead of being separated into a course experience.
The right answer is often a mix of guidance, tools, workflow change, and environment, not a module.
Whether learning teams get comfortable recommending things they do not call “training.”
Nothing in this theme yet.
Edition 01 covers three signals. Clear the filter to see them all.
Editorial note: every future edition cites primary sources for external developments. This one sets the format without inventing time-sensitive news.
Submit a signal
Not a press release. A shift you noticed in your own team, a study that moved you, a tool that quietly changed the shape of the job.
Goes straight to Andy. The three questions come pre-filled.
Get it by email
Three signals, the same three questions, no trend chasing. Unsubscribe whenever.
The filter
The Radar exists to separate novelty from consequence. If a development does not change a decision, a behavior, or an assumption, it stays off the page.